Skip to main content

Subsidiarity in Exodus

I have been studying aspects of communitarian and distributist thought, but I have not thought to explore roots of them in the Bible. Then Monday night at a Bible study someone referred to subsidiarity in the advice of Jethro to Moses.

In the 18th Chapter of Exodus Moses's father-in-law, Jethro, the priest of Midian, seeks him out in the desert near Mt Sinai.  Moses greets him by bowing before him and kissing him, showing the respect he has for Jethro.
Jethro praises and blesses Yahweh for the good he has done Israel and brings a holocaust to God.

The next day Moses sits as the judge for all the disputes of Israel and the wait for judgement is from morning to evening.  Jethro instantly sees the foolishness of this and asks Moses why he sits alone while making people wait for judgement. Moses says all these people come to him to consult God.  But Jethro says you will wear yourself out and also these people. Jethro says that Moses should be the peoples representative to God but look for trustworthy men to set as officers over thousands, hundreds, fifties and tens.  The more important cases will be sent to Moses.

Moses followed Jethro's advice.  He appointed officers to handle all the ordinary cases.

Seen in this light subsidiarity is a quite old principle and not opposed to government, not a libertarian principle, but a principle of government. The more decisions can be made close to the people affected the happier they will be.

So subsidiarity is not about having a powerless government, but about how close that government is to the people.  Government has it's proper role and necessary things that cannot be done by voluntary organization must be done by government.  But the government is most effective and just when authority is distributed downwards.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Serenading the Donkey

Over the years I have had many times when I have had to call out others on their words, behavior, or attitudes on race, class or ethnicity and I have used a variety of means to get my point across.  The first  such incident was when I was 13 years old and my sister and a friend were skipping rope to the rope song that uses the "N_" word.   I said we don't use that word in this place and the girls argued with me about it. I just said that if they used that word I would go tell Grandpa, and they complied.  In a high school the teacher had let the discussion degenerate and the topic of "welfare" came up and a girl stated  an old stereotype that my Daddy says "All the blacks go pick up their welfare checks in Cadillacs."  I wanted that direction of the conversation to end immediately, so I blurted out "Well your Daddy is a racist."  There was silence in the room for a couple of minutes and then the teacher changed the subject.  When people have b
 Striking at Bourgeois Values with "Free Stuff"  Why is it that in middle class neighborhoods no one would think anything of it if you are having a "yard sale"  or a "moving sale", spending your entire day selling your possessions at pennies on the dollar, a tenth of what you could get on E-Bay, making less than the federal minimum wage for your efforts, but they would shrink in horror from a "free stuff pile".  What is the world coming from that  they place so little value on material possessions that they would give it away for nothing.  Someone will surely complain that you are doing "illegal dumping", even if you tend the pile and fold things back up.  Fortunately for me, I live in a neighborhood with a heavy student population, north of Seattle's University of Washington campus, and such a pile is welcome.  Having purged the house of unneeded things that aren't worth my time trying to sell (unlike my art, which I will find